News Forum

The Apollo Moon Missions Were Faked in a Studio

 
 



Go Back   News Forum > The Lounge
The Lounge Forum The Apollo Moon Missions Were Faked in a Studio at News Forum - The evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked in a studio is crushing. The US government can't censor the ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-04-2010, 02:22 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3
Default The Apollo Moon Missions Were Faked in a Studio

The evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked in a studio is crushing. The US government can't censor the evidence that's on the internet but it can bury it with disinformation and obfuscation. If you enter "Apollo hoax" in Google, you'll find about fifteen pro-Apollo sites for every hoax site. I made a collection of some of the hoax evidence the government is trying to bury.

YouTube - Apollo 15 flag waving
At the 2 minute 35 second mark of the video the flag is still. When the astronaut goes past it, it starts to move.

There's an analysis of that here in this three part series.
YouTube - MoonFaker: The Flags Are Alive. PART 1.

More here...
YouTube - MoonFaker: Flagging The Dead Horses
YouTube - Initial Apollo 15 Flag Movement
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There's a noticeable difference in the body movements in these two clips.
YouTube - Moon Landing Hoax - Wires Footage
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11v.1101330.rm

What I hypothesize is that a fifty percent slow-motion was used in Apollo 11 to simulate lunar gravity. Later, they improved their methods of simulating lunar gravity and started using a combination of slow-motion and support wires. The slow-motion in the later missions might not have been exactly half-speed. It might have been sixty five or seventy percent of natural speed. It looked better but it was inconsistent with Apollo 11 footage. The inconsistency is apparent.

At around the 21 minute mark of this video the above footage from Apollo 11 can be seen played at double speed.
Man didnt land on the moon

It can also be seen in this video at around the 30 minute 40 second mark.
Funny thing happened on the way to the Moon - Czech subtitles / České titulky

(The above video "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" keeps going on and off-line. If the above link is dead, click here)
a funny thing happened on the way to the moon - Buscar con Google

It looks just like movement in earth gravity.
--------------------------------
When the footage from this clip is doubled, the movements look unnaturally fast.
YouTube - Moon Landing Hoax - Wires Footage

Here it is doubled.
YouTube - Jumping on the moon at double speed

When the Apollo 11 footage is doubled, the movements look natural. This makes it very clear that they used a simple fifty percent slow-motion to simulate lunar gravity in Apollo 11 and a faster slow-motion (around 67 percent according to Jarrah White's calculations)...
YouTube - MoonFaker: The Penny Drops. PART 1

...combined with wire supports in the later missions.
YouTube - MoonFaker: The Penny Drops. PART 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you look at the acceleration of the object that falls from the astronaut's backpack and the acceleration of the hammer and feather that fall, it's apparent that there's a difference in the way gravity affects the objects.
YouTube - Feather & Hammer Drop on Moon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK2Fy85VyRg

Evidently the slow-motion speed is different.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Watch how the corner of Collins' jacket moves in this clip.
Apollo XI: The Little Gem. Part 4 - LiveVideo.com
(4:10 time mark)

It swings back and forth the way it would in gravity.
Look at the corners of the jacket the woman astronaut is wearing in this clip.
YouTube - Discovery Crew Enters International Space Station

This is real zero-gravity and they behave quite differently.
One possible explanation is that they were trying to fake zero-gravity in a diving plane and the plane wasn't diving fast enough at that point.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no blast crater under the lander.
http://thoughtworld.files.wordpress....7/picture1.jpg

That is discussed in this five part video series.
YouTube - MoonFaker: No Crater. PART 1

The moon rocks are often presented as proof the missions were real. There are plausible explanations that would explain them.
YouTube - MoonFaker: Exhibit D. PART 5.
YouTube - MoonFaker: Rocks & Crocks. PART 1.
28. "Moon stones" coming from the Earth - "lunar probes" werešnot necessary


People say the Soviets would have snitched. There are explanations for that too:
YouTube - moonfaker cold war

Nardwuar vs Bill Kaysing
(excerpt)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, why did they keep faking the Apollo flights, I still don't understand. Did the Soviet Union know it was faked? Why did they keep shut up if they knew it was faked? 'Cause a lot of people would think they kept the moon race going to prove the U.S. was better than the Soviet Union. If the Soviet Union knew, why did they let the U.S. get away with this?
Well, I'll tell you - at the highest levels there is a coalition between governments. In other words, the Soviets said, if you won't tell on us - and they faked most of their space exploration flights - we won't tell on you. It's as simple as that. See, what Apollo is, is the beginning of the end of the ability of the government to hoodwink and bamboozle and manipulate the people. More and more people are becoming aware in the U.S. that the government is totally and completely public enemy number one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake?
(excerpt)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Soviets, with their own competing moon program and an intense economic and political and military rivalry with the USA, could be expected to have cried foul if the USA tried to fake a Moon landing. Theorist Ralph Rene responds that shortly after the alleged Moon landings, the USA silently started shipping hundreds of thousands of tons of grain as humanitarian aid to the allegedly starving USSR. He views this as evidence of a cover-up, the grain being the price of silence. (The Soviet Union in fact had its own Moon program).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Noam Chomsky's analysis of the cold war-
Noam Chomsky, How the Cold War worked from What Uncle Sam Really Wants
(excerpt)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On the domestic front, the Cold War helped the Soviet Union entrench its military-bureaucratic ruling class in power, and it gave the US a way to compel its population to subsidise high-tech industry. It isn't easy to sell all that to the domestic populations. The technique used was the old stand-by-fear of a great enemy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It someone were to make a deathbed statement saying the moon missions were faked, the press would never report it as the press is controlled.
Media Watch
YouTube - chomsky media
YouTube - William Schaap - Part 1/8 - The Media, CIA, FBI & Disinfo.

Also, it would be downright dangerous for someone to come forward. Look what happened to these guys.
YouTube - Thomas Baron and astronauts killed to keep Apollo program
YouTube - Sacrifice On Pad 34.

continued...
Cosmored is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 02:24 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3
Default

...continued

Here are some videos.

YouTube - moonfaker
YouTube - Apollo Moon Hoax? Dr. David Groves Analysis
YouTube - Apollo Moon Hoax? Spotlights, Fall-off, Camera Angles
YouTube - Shuttle at the van Allen Belts
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=rhoWabHSm_g
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=1gD2P-Po_Gk
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=EaV7QB_ReTw
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=0ohDdNRq2Og
http://www.thule.org/brains/moon.rm
YouTube - Moon hoax - Wire Supports (Mythbusters)
Roverplantsreflector.flv video by RackTheMouse - Photobucket
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Happened on the Moon" (documentary)
what happened on the moon - Buscar con Google
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here are some articles.

Nardwuar vs Bill Kaysing
Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake?
http://www.aulis.com/skeleton.html
Interview with Bart Sibrel
http://www.geocities.com/apollotruth/
AULIS Online – Different Thinking
northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com on reddit.com
Northerntruthseeker: Project Apollo... What Were They Thinking? Part II
The Apollo Hoax
Moon Hoax - SourceWatch
Apollo and NASA
Center for an Informed America
(Wagging the Moondoggie)

The astronauts look pretty nervous at the press conference.
YouTube - Clip of Apollo 11 press conference

Here's a link to the entire conference.
Conferencia de Prensa Astronautas Apollo 11

This keeps going on and offline so if this link is dead, try googling "Apollo 11 press conference".

Their behavior look pretty suspicious here too. It begins in the second half of the video.
Did we really land Men on the Moon?

continued...
Cosmored is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 02:26 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3
Default

...continued

The main reason they had to fake it was probably space radiation. Here are some articles and videos I've found on the subject.

http://www.geocities.com/apollotruth/
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is an old saying that "A liar needs a good memory". Nowhere is this more true than in the Apollo program. NASA tell lies to cover up previous lies, and other discrepancies uncovered by people investigating the Moon landings. Altering previous data, removing photographs, and retracting statements made, only re-enforces the evidence that NASA are on the run, and being forced into a corner to which they cannot escape. The actions of those under investigation makes the investigator more aware they are bluffing. The longer that person, or persons, who make the extravagant claims continue, the more lies they have to tell in order to counteract it, until it reaches the point where it becomes ridiculous. That point was passed in July 1999, when NASA officials were questioned about the Moon landings on television. They dodged the all important questions like a drifter dodges the heat.
Many Apollo astronauts have long since died, as to have many of the original NASA officials involved in the scam, consequently current officials, who know that Apollo was a fake, have not quite got it right when talking openly in public. Perhaps the biggest slip of the tongue was made by NASA Chief Dan Goldin when interviewed by UK TV journalist Sheena McDonald in 1994. He said that mankind cannot venture beyond Earth orbit, 250 miles into space, until they can find a way to overcome the dangers of cosmic radiation. He must have forgot that they supposedly sent 27 astronauts 250,000 miles outside Earth orbit 36 years earlier.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YouTube - Shuttle at the van Allen Belts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZ65d30kYME

two sets of radiation data
NASA REALLY MOONED US
(excerpt)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To prove his thesis, Rene tries to get certain solar data from NATIONAL
OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA) using clever techniques
to
disguise his true intentions, [i.e. to get true data on solar flares.] NOAA,
unfortunately, proved to be as cagey as Rene in dodging the giving out of any
really good DETAILS on this matter, [you know, where the devil resides.]
Rene, seeing games being played, deduced that there must be two sets of data,
one which is sent to scientists on the preferred list, and one sent to the
likes of Rene as casual strangers. (p.125)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deadly Radiation At and Past the Van Allen Shields
Apollo details
NASA Warped our View of Space - The Education Forum

These two are important
---------------------------
Articles_1
YouTube - MoonFaker: Exhibit C. PART 5
---------------------------

YouTube - Lunarcy: NASA's Radiation Problem
YouTube - Lunarcy: NASA's Radiation Problem II
YouTube - Lunarcy: NASA's Radiation Problem 2.5 4 Dummies
YouTube - Lunarcy: NASA's Radiation Problem III (Major Solar Flares)
YouTube - Lunarcy: NASA's Radiation Problem 3.5 Addendum
YouTube - Lunarcy: NASA's Radiation Problem IV (Radiation Everywhere)
---------------------------
YouTube - Lunarcy: NASA's Radiation Problem 4.5
YouTube - MoonFaker: Cold War II. PART 2
---------------------------
YouTube - MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly. PART 1.
(23 parts)

The Chinese space walks were obviously faked in a water tank and NASA's official position is that the Chinese space walks were real.
YouTube - Proof China Faked Their Spacewalk (Part 2)
YouTube - About paper and bubbles of ShenzhouVII
Confirmed Discrepancies in CCTV?s Live Broadcast of Shenzhou VII Launch | China | Epoch Times
China Astronauts Make Low-Profile Visit to Hong Kong | China | Epoch Times

The pro-Apollo posters at the forums of both the "Clavius" and "Bad Astronomy" websites tap danced around the evidence that the Chinese space walk was faked because they have to agree with the official US government version and they can't say it was faked without looking silly. Here are the threads. They're hilarious.

Chinese space walk conspiracy
ApolloHoax.net - Phony Chinese Spacewalk

They pretty much destroyed the credibility of those two sites when they didn't seriously address the evidence.
Rules of Disinformation

It's pretty clear that they're government damage-control sites.

Here's some good research if anyone wants to delve further.
Viewing Single Post From: We Never Went to the Moon

On this thread there's a debate between Jarrah White and Jay Windley.
IMDb :: Boards :: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon (2001) :: Could this be one of the most under-app...

Jay Windley is the most famous pro-Apollo person on the internet.
Clavius: Conspiracy - about the author

Jarrah White is the main hoax-believer on the internet.
YouTube - moonfaker

Here's some more stuff on Clavius and Bad Astronomy and Jay Windley.
Let's analyze the Clavius and Bad Astronomy sites - David Icke's Official Forums
Cosmored is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 11:45 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 15
Default

As many,I also considered the possibility?However,I have researched much of the evidence;and I am convinced the Apollo Moon Landing is real.
chizmarlan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2010, 05:55 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6
Default

This topic is always a nice one. I'm actually also convinced that the moon landing happend exactly this way, although i thought for a long time that they maybe faked the video (because they couldn't film the actual landing, but needing something they could show on tv) but then I was web conferencing with a guy (an expert) once and he convinced me, that everything was real. but talking about a conspiracy theory is always fun.
marrcuss is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2010, 09:42 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cosmored View Post
If you enter "Apollo hoax" in Google, you'll find about fifteen pro-Apollo sites for every hoax site.
I noticed that myself. My guess for the discrepancies (and this is only a guess) is that the conspiracy people are outnumbered fifteen-to-one.

My views are based on 40 years' experience in the aerospace/defense business, including working for a NASA contactor (IBM Federal Systems Division -- the developer and supplier of the computational assets for the program) and acrtually being on-site at Greenbelt during the first half of the program (1968-1971). However, I have noticed that first-hand experience sometimes is trumped by wishful thinking, especially when it comes to conspiracies.

I guess each of us will arrive at his/her own conclusions based on whatever evidence is available -- and believable.

Last edited by LFTheria; 10-14-2010 at 09:48 AM.
LFTheria is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2010, 02:25 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marrcuss View Post
This topic is always a nice one. I'm actually also convinced that the moon landing happend exactly this way, although i thought for a long time that they maybe faked the video (because they couldn't film the actual landing, but needing something they could show on tv) but then I was web conferencing with a guy (an expert) once and he convinced me, that everything was real. but talking about a conspiracy theory is always fun.
it's monday and i am bored haha.... that's why i read some articles and checked out some of the links mentioned above.. and i guess LFTheria is right, that we all come to our own conconclusion anyway but it seems like mine is mutable

happy beginning of the week!
marrcuss is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Review: Yoostar is a movie-studio-in-a-box NF Reporter Technology 0 08-28-2009 06:31 AM
Missing high-flier may have faked distress call NF Reporter USA News 0 01-13-2009 06:51 AM
XNA Game Studio 2.0 Now Supports Xbox LIVE NF Reporter Microsoft Xbox 0 12-13-2007 04:49 AM
Combat missions? Clinton, Edwards spar NF Reporter Politics 0 11-08-2007 09:41 PM
ESA director discusses space missions NF Reporter Science / Space 0 02-28-2007 06:23 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.