Global White Population to Plummet to Single Digit—Black Population to Double

TheCountess · 05-22-2008, 04:05 PM

Global White Population to Plummet to Single Digit—Black Population to Double

The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom
As a percentage of world inhabitants, the white population will plummet to a single digit (9.76%) by 2060 from a high-water mark of 27.98% in 1950.

Using 2010 as the base reference, the big gainer in the population derby will be blacks or sub-Sahara Africans. This group will expand almost 133% to 2.7 billion by 2060. By the middle of this century blacks will represent 25.38% of world population, which is up dramatically from the 8.97% they recorded in 1950.

The other groups measured in the study were the Central Asians (Indians), East Asians (Chinese and Japanese), the Southeast Asians, Arabic (North Africa and the Middle East), and Amerindian-Mestizo (Mexican and Central America). All these groups will experience a population growth. The Chinese/Japanese and Indians will trade rankings and the relative global presence of the other groups will remain more or less constant.

The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom. A side bar will be the single digit minority role that whites will assume. Of the 7 population groups studied, only whites are projected to sustain an absolute decline in numbers.

In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%. From 2010 the white population will decline while blacks will add 1.2 billion to their numbers. In this time frame the the Indian subcontinent will gain 1.2 billion people. These groups and their governments will be looking for elbow room, and the diminished presence of whites in Europe, and especially in the relatively wide open spaces North America, will provide such an opportunity. Specifically, countries like Canada, the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Russia can expect to be pressured to accept collectively hundreds of millions of refugees from India, and sub-Sahara Africa.

(Click on link below to get your free copy of the report)

National Policy Institute - Publications

TheCountess · 07-21-2008, 01:58 PM

YouTube - ~ NPI: Global White Population to Plummet to a Single Digit

waltky · 07-21-2008, 04:50 PM

Granny says, "Dat's right...

... we is an endangered species."

waltky · 08-13-2008, 11:57 PM

Granny says, "Dat's right - purt soon we gonna be extinct, den the country gonna really go to hell in a handbasket...

White Americans no longer a majority by 2042
Wed., Aug. 13, 2008 WASHINGTON - Immigration, higher birth rates among minorities to speed up diversity

Quote:

White people will no longer make up a majority of Americans by 2042, according to new government projections. That's eight years sooner than previous estimates, made in 2004. The nation has been growing more diverse for decades, but the process has sped up through immigration and higher birth rates among minority residents, especially Hispanics. It is also growing older.

"The white population is older and very much centered around the aging baby boomers who are well past their high fertility years," said William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank. "The future of America is epitomized by the young people today. They are basically the melting pot we are going to see in the future." The Census Bureau Thursday released population projections through 2050, based on rates for births, deaths and immigration. They are subject to big revisions, depending on immigration policy, cultural changes and natural or manmade disasters.

The U.S. has nearly 305 million people today. The population is projected to hit 400 million in 2039 and 439 million in 2050. That's like adding all the people from France and Britain, said Steve A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington group that advocates tighter immigration policies. White non-Hispanics make up about two-thirds of the population, but only 55 percent of those younger than 5.

By 2050, whites will make up 46 percent of the population and blacks will make up 15 percent, a relatively small increase from today. Hispanics, who make up about 15 percent of the population today, will account for 30 percent in 2050, according to the new projections. Asians, which make up about 5 percent of the population, are projected to increase to 9 percent by 2050. The population 85 and older is projected to more than triple by 2050, to 19 million.

White Americans no longer a majority by 2042 - Race & ethnicity - MSNBC.com

waltky · 08-19-2008, 05:59 AM

Calif. leadin' the way...

California leads nation in immigrant births
08/19/2008 - A new and more nuanced national report about fertility shows a significantly higher share of babies are born to immigrants in California than in any other state, even as a lower-than-average share of the state's births are to poor women and women on welfare.

Quote:

Nationally, the U.S. Census report shows that more American women are skipping motherhood or are waiting longer to have children, a trend already evident in California, where birthrates to women in their 40s have tripled the past two decades. "Women are delaying their childbearing until they complete their educations," said Jane Lawler Dye, a family demographer with the Bureau and author of the report, which is based on population data collected in 2006.

By drawing from a broader population sample than in the past, the new fertility study looks at the differences in birth rates between Hispanic women of succeeding generations. It also examines the wide variation in fertility among the states. While women who had given birth in the previous year in California were the most likely to be immigrants, new mothers in Mississippi were most likely to be poor. New mothers in Iowa were the most likely to be working, while those in Texas were the most likely to lack a high school diploma.

"This is the first time we've looked at a lot of these characteristics," Dye said. "We've never shown this much detail." About 41 percent of births in California in 2005 and 2006 were to immigrant mothers, according to the new report, a significant number considering that immigrants account for more than one-third of births in only one other state - Nevada, where 34 percent of births were to immigrants. In part, California's high share of immigrant births reflects the fact that immigrants make up a larger slice of California's total population than in any other state, demographers said.

More http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_10243765

waltky · 10-24-2008, 09:10 AM

Texas social services strained by Latino fertility...

Hispanic baby boom has Texas ramifications
Friday, October 24, 2008 - Call it the Hispanic baby boom.

Quote:

Fertility has surpassed immigration as the primary factor in the United States' Latino population growth, according to a Pew Hispanic Center report released on Thursday. The Hispanic population has increased by 10.2 million since 2000, with 6 million the result of births in the United States and 4.2 million due to immigration. "We are now seeing secondary repercussions," said Richard Fry, a senior research associate at the Pew Hispanic Center. "A large group of second-generation kids are having a big impact on the school system, and as they mature, it will affect voting and the labor market."

This is especially true in Texas, said Mr. Fry, since large immigration fluxes in the 1980s and 1990s have led to more U.S.-born children. The state has the second-largest Hispanic population in the country with more than 2.7 million native-born Hispanic children. Nine percent of Hispanic children were recorded as foreign-born in 2007, compared with 12 percent seven years before. "This has profound implications for schools and other public services in terms of ensuring that the system has adequate recourses to provide for the needs of this population," said Jeanne Batalova, a policy analyst at the Washington-based Migration Policy Institute.

Already, the Dallas Independent School District is 66 percent Hispanic. Irving's school system has a Latino population of 67 percent. Bexar, Dallas and Harris counties continue to have some of the highest Hispanic populations in the country, but populations are also dispersing to other less-concentrated areas such as Fort Bend, Hays and Comal counties, according to the report. Dallas County's Latino population has increased by about 240,000 in the past decade.

MORE

Icorigin · 10-24-2008, 02:12 PM

In determining the actual and not supposed nor alleged age of any physical item, and of any physical occurrence of some event in the past, given parameters are frequently calibrated by preconceived assumptions (if such beliefs are true) or presumptions (if such beliefs are false).

For example, if it is [falsely] presumed that the Biblical record of creation days is erroneous, bad or wrong mythology, imaginary superstition, or outright lies.....OR it is [falsely] presumed that the English word days in Genesis chapter one of Scripture relating to the actual Hebrew Text does not mean literal 24-hour days at all, but is to be groundlessly [mis-]interpreted allegorically, metaphorically, or symbolically as immensely-long periods of million-years/billion-years time.....calibration of everything from concocted quasi-"artistic" misrendition time declarations plus faulty measurement by misadjusted radioactive-decay dating will consequentially be grossly inaccurate.....and if such is dogmatically promoted while the propagandizing perpetrator is quite aware of the baselessness and prooflessness of non-accurate presumptions, the deviate is shamefully guilty of worthless and despicable blatant non-scientific and anti-scientific dishonesty and deception.

On the other hand, if it is [rightly] assumed that the Biblical record of creation days is correct and accurate historically as adhered to by faith and belief which cannot be logically nor scientifically disproven, pertaining to the Hebrew-Text use of the word yom [pronounced: yohm] for day along with the ordinal numbers 1st day, 2nd day, 3rd day, etc. and further qualified by the Hebrew idiomatic expression: ...and there was evening and there was morning....., there is absolutely no sensible nor legitimate alternative but to assert that the days of Creation Week actually were 24-hour periods (with or without the presence of the Sun coming into existence on Day 4 of Creation Week).

Clearly, then, we can safely set parameters of dating objects and phenomena occurrences concordant with Holy Writ, and forthrightly proclaim that this planet and the other contents of the universe are no more than 8000 years old, calculating in accord with the 24-hour days of Creation Week followed by the overlapping centuries-old longevity ages of listed Old-Testament patriarchs in the opening chapters of Genesis, and others thereafter.

In addition to carefully examining and utilizing precise Biblical semantics to correctly calibrate timing standards for postulations of calendar dates determining the age of antiquities, the very definition of how time is measured must be considered. Exactly how long should a second or a minute be thought of? Throughout the entire Bible such are never mentioned, but of course hours, days and years are found. IS the present "scientific" measurement for the precise duration of a "second" and then consequentially a "minute" realistic according to:

Genesis 1:14 And God said, "Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to separate the day from the night; and let them be for signs and for seasons and for days and years....

To add to confusion about that, some so-called "scientists" or even "creationists" purport that the speed of Earth's rotation is "slowing down." Whether or not such is true, we have the additional problem of "leap years," indicating current calendars are not in sync with nature as described in Genesis 1:14 stated above.

Another vital factor to correctly calibrate timing in terms of suggesting how old things are or when in the past an event occurred, especially relating to calibrating standards for radiometric dating, is to take into consideration unusual phenomena which scientists have become aware of though whatever reliable source (especially Genesis and other parts of Scripture). For example, it is obvious through extensive and honest analysis of sedimentary rock formations and the fossils therein that a worldwide catastrophic flood is the best explanation for the plethoria of topsy-turvy mixed-up combinations and assortments of both rock and fossil types. Such a flood at least allegedly and at best did historically occur according to the record of Genesis at the time of the patriarch Noah.

Having established that, is proof of age pertaining to an object or an occurrence of some phenomena in the past done by inductive or deductive reasoning?

There are at least two mechanisms by which dates within the past 8000 years can be deduced:

(1) The nonhistoricity before inception of existence technique, and
(2) The simultaneous existence by comparative association technique.

Elaboration of both will follow.

Let us take the patriarch David as an example regarding (1) above.

This is the first reference to "David" in the entire Revised Standard Version Bible:

Ruth 4:17 And the women of the neighborhood gave him a name, saying, "A son has been born to Naomi." They named him Obed; he was the father of Jesse, the father of David.

There is NO reference to "David" before that, logically indicating that "David" probably did not exist before a certain point of time in history. After the Ruth 4:17 reference stated above, "David" is mentioned over and over all throughout the remainder of the entire Bible. Thus, in relation to at what time in the past "David" was mentioned and never mentioned, dating of historically-occurring phenomena can efficably be calibrated and calculated.

Regarding (2) above, calibration and calculation for the calendar-date timing or age-setting of David's contemporary "Saul" can be set in relation to the closely-associated contextual association with "David." Here are some references (with context) to BOTH "David" and "Saul" together:

First Samuel 16:14 Now the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD tormented him.
1Sam 16:15 And Saul's servants said to him, "Behold now, an evil spirit from God is tormenting you.
1Sam 16:17 So Saul said to his servants, "Provide for me a man who can play well, and bring him to me."
1Sam 16:19 Therefore Saul sent messengers to Jesse, and said, "Send me David your son, who is with the sheep."
1Sam 16:20 And Jesse took an ass laden with bread, and a skin of wine and a kid, and sent them by David his son to Saul.
1Sam 16:21 And David came to Saul, and entered his service. And Saul loved him greatly, and he became his armor-bearer.
1Sam 16:22 And Saul sent to Jesse, saying, "Let David remain in my service, for he has found favor in my sight."
1Sam 16:23 And whenever the evil spirit from God was upon Saul, David took the lyre and played it with his hand; so Saul was refreshed, and was well, and the evil spirit departed from him.

To use modern examples, how can it be proven precisely when in the past such people as Genghis Khan, Columbus, Martin Luther, Napoleon, or even Lincoln, Marx, Lenin, and Hitler lived?

That is almost as difficult in describing the colors red, white, and blue verbally...or verbally proving immediately that oxygen or gravity or craters on Pluto exist without promptly presenting pictures or demonstrating their effects.

Enter the phenomena of sketches, paintings, photos, movies, and videos.

Correlating whatever with whatever is visible within such media is quite telling as to when such occurred in the past. For example, if we see year number "1776" next to (or better yet: within) a portrait of George Washington, we can assume that George lived sometime during 1776 A.D. and probably sometime before and after that.

It is well to keep all this in mind when we read pseudo-"scientific" newspaper articles involving nonsubstantiated declarations of phenomena in the past supposedly being "millions of years" old, see description plaques and/or hear narrated tours of caves and natural-history exhibits and/or visit public-school "science" classrooms and hear what is being alleged about preposterously-long time periods of presumed "scientific" "historical" "fact."

Such aberrant heresy plainly does not jive with the trusted Biblical record, and therefore must be held in suspect while relentlessly doubted and questioned.