News Forum

Court rules against Obamacare rule


Go Back   News Forum > Top Stories > Breaking News
Breaking News Forum Court rules against Obamacare rule at News Forum - CNN - Found 1 hour ago Washington (CNN) -- Some corporations have religious rights, a deeply divided Supreme Court decided ...

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2014, 09:31 PM   #1
Senior Member
NF Reporter's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 67,982
Default Court rules against Obamacare rule

CNN - Found 1 hour ago
Washington (CNN) -- Some corporations have religious rights, a deeply divided Supreme Court decided Monday in ruling that certain for-profit companies cannot be required to pay for specific types of contraceptives for their employees. The 5-4 decision on ideological lines ended the high court's term ...
Editorial: Congress should narrow the Religious Freedom Restoration Act - Washington Post
Hillary Calls Hobby Lobby Decision â??A Really Bad Slippery Slopeâ?? - Time
Hillary Clinton Warns Hobby Lobby Ruling 'A Really Bad Slippery Slope' - ABC News
Explore All
Yahoo! News

Court rules against Obamacare rule
NF Reporter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2014, 04:14 AM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Okolona, Ky.
Posts: 26,678

Granny says if she had a chance to argue the case, she'd argue it's costing people too much money...

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Obamacare Subsidy Case
November 7, 2014 – The U.S. Supreme Court announced Friday that it would hear a case challenging the payment of billions of dollars of subsidies to Americans enrolled in Obamacare health care exchanges run by the federal government.
The justices will hear an appeal filed on behalf of four Virginia residents who maintain that subsidies to buy health insurance under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) only apply to an “exchange established by the state.” Fourteen states set up their own insurance exchanges. But 36 states, including Virginia, declined to do so, so residents in those states use exchanges set up and run by the federal government under HealthCare.Gov.

The appeal pointed out that a 2012 rule by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that subsidies could be paid to enrollees of federally-operated exchanges was in direct conflict with the statutory language. “Notwithstanding the ACA’s text and purpose, the IRS in 2011 proposed, and in 2012 promulgated, regulations requiring the Treasury to grant subsidies for coverage purchases through all Exchanges – not only those established by states under Section 1131 of the Act, but also those established by HHS under Section. 1321…. "These regulations contradict the statutory text restricting subsidies to Exchanges ‘established by the State under section 1311,” according to the lawsuit.

Noting conflicting rulings on the IRS Rule by two appeals courts, the appellants noted: “The resulting uncertainty over this major plank of ACA implementation means that millions of people have no idea if they may rely on the IRS’s promise to subsidize their health coverage, or if that money will be clawed back. “Employers in 36 states have no idea if they will be penalized under the ACA’s employer mandate, or are effectively exempt from it. “Insurers have no idea if their customers will pay for health coverage in which they enrolled, or if large numbers will default. “And the Treasury has no idea if billions of dollars being spent each month were authorized by Congress, or if these expenditures are illegal. Only this Court can definitively resolve the matter.”

White House spokesman Josh Earnest attacked the lawsuit in a statement as a “partisan attempt to undermine the Affordable Care Act and to strip millions of American families of tax credits that Congress intended them to have.” But the high court’s decision to hear the case is considered a “significant setback for the Obama administration." Ann Purvis, with the National Center for Policy Analysis, points out that "if the subsidies are struck down, insurance costs for many will skyrocket." Purvis pointed to a recent RAND Corporation study predicting that "eliminating subsidies entirely would send premiums rising by up to 43 percent and drop Obamacare enrollment by 68 percent."

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Obamacare Subsidy Case | CNS News
waltky is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Decision time: Live coverage of the Supreme Court's ruling on Obamacare NF Reporter Law 5 09-04-2013 07:51 AM
US Supreme Court poised to rule on 'Obamacare' NF Reporter Health 5 08-16-2013 08:06 PM
US court likely to rule Monday on Chrysler-Fiat (AFP) NF Reporter Law 1 06-08-2009 09:49 PM
Appeals court upholds NYC's calories-on-menus rule NF Reporter Health 0 02-17-2009 02:04 PM
Dutch court poised to rule on ABN's LaSalle sale NF Reporter Business 0 07-13-2007 01:38 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.